Pastoral Aesthetic Quotes- 19

"There never yet have been, nor are there now, too many good books."

--Martin Luther

Pastoral Aesthetic Quotes- 18

"So let's shut up and bite this Lilliputian-sized tax bullet. Help keep some great old paintings and some deranged new ones in plain view of the average citizen, and at the same time, help defend individual expression against the first wave of the brain gendarmes."

--Dennis Miller in The Rants

Pastoral Aesthetic Quotes- 17

"The Christian artist will often be an irritant, disturbing the anthropocentric view of the world that fallen nature naturally gravitates toward."

--Steve Turner in Imagine: A Vision for Christians in the Arts

Introspective Interlude 1

Lately, I've gotten back into the practice of listening to books on tape or CD in my car instead of music or the radio. This certainly helps out with my goal of reading 75 books by the end of the year. It also gives me a quite a variety of reading/listening material.

The book I most recently finished was A Match Made in Heaven by Robert L. Mitchell. It tells the story of a Harvard professor named Elliott Goodman. The good professor has a heart attack, and while the hospital staff is trying to save his life, a dialogue with God. God asks why he should spare Elliott. God gives him a chance to save his life by playing golf. God sends down 18 icons of human history to play against Elliott, 1 per hole. he plays for his life against people like Leonardo DaVinci, John Lennon, Babe Ruth, Edgar Allan Poe, Moses, Gandhi, Socrates, and others.

This is not a Christian book, and will not match Christian theology in any manner. However, that's not really the aim of this post. While I enjoyed the book's depictions of the historical figures, and the parallels it made between golf and life, it did get me thinking about another thing.

Suppose I were in the same situation. Who would I want to play golf against, given the chance? Here's my list. The numbers correspond only to people. They are not indicative of hole numbering. It should also be noted that no one on the list is still living. I will amend the list as the situation demands.

1. St. Paul
2. Johnny Cash
3. Humphrey Bogart
4. Albert Einstein
5. Richard Wright
6. Cole Porter
7. Benjamin Franklin
8. Langston Hughes
9. Martin Luther
10. Katherine Hepburn
11. Kate Chopin
12. Curly Howard
13. Henri Nouwen
14. Rod Serling
15. Martin Luther King, Jr.
16. Fred Rogers
17. Basil Rathbone
18. Charles M. Schulz

Movie Review- The Last Airbender

I have never seen the cartoon on which this film is based. I saw this film because I'm a big fan of its director, M. Night Shyamalan. I've been a fan since The Sixth Sense. I hated The Happening. So, I was eager to see him bounce back. I was not disappointed! I know many professional critics dislike this film. That's fine, they're entitled to their educated opinion.

The plot itself seemed convoluted to me, but this is largely due to my own lack of familiarity with the source material. Fortunately, other people summarize the plot much better than I do. Yahoo! gives the following: "Air, Water, Earth, Fire. Four nations tied by destiny when the Fire Nation launches a brutal war against the others. A century has passed with no hope in sight to change the path of this destruction. Caught between combat and courage, Aang discovers he is the lone Avatar with the power to manipulate all four elements. Aang teams with Katara, a Waterbender, and her brother Sokka to restore balance to their war-torn world."

Fortunately, this blog is more dedicated to spiritual issues than plot. And this film is loaded with spiritual issues. Examples include the power of belief, communing with a 'spirit world", reincarnation, dedication to religious vocations, as well as others which I know I am overlooking.

Many critics, profession and otherwise, and many filmgoers in general have given up on Shyamalan. But, the above paragraph explains why I have not. Regardless of the aesthetic merits of most his work post-Signs, his films speak to me. I thought about why this is. Then it hit me, the films of his which I love (all except The Happening) deal with persons trying to find their purpose. I've struggled with that issue personally.

Regarding theological issues, the films seems to be a conglomeration of various Eastern theologies. The discerning viewer will want to familiar with the basics of such religions as Buddhism and Hinduism, as well as pantheism. That sounds like a LOT of effort, just to see a movie, but it IS worth it.

Spiritual issues the film discusses include purpose, reincarnation, supernatural powers, monasticism, as well as others, such as corruption of power.

GOSPEL HANDLES

Aang (though a reincarnation of the Avatar), is the chosen one who will save the people. He is the only one who can master all the elements. He has special tattoos (markings) which identify him as the Avatar.

Also, there is a scene where the princess of the water tribe sacrifices herself so the people can be saved.

CLERGY HANDLES

Monks and priests abound in this film. They live in temples. They are not Christian monks or priests, though it is unclear what religion they actually are.

Many of our parishioners have children who are quite familiar with the cartoon series. That alone makes it worth seeing. I enjoyed the film, and still believe in M. Night Shyamalan, even if everyone else doesn't.

Pastoral Aesthetic Quotes- 16

"The promise of art and revolution is that people might discard their preconceptions and truly understand what is in the mind of another."

--John Hockenberry in Moving Violations

Pastoral Aesthetic Quotes- 15

"Like an artist who transfers mental images and colors to canvas, so the visioncaster paints a picture in the imagination of his audience."

--Andy Stanley in Visioneering, p. 90)

Pastoral Aesthetic Quotes- 14

"Epic poetry and Tragedy, Comedy also and Dithyrambic poetry, and the music of the flute and of the lyre in most of their forms, are all in their general conception modes of imitation. They differ, however, from one another in three respects, -the medium, the objects, the manner or mode of imitation, being in each case distinct."

--Aristotle (in Poetics)

The End of LOST & 24

Recently, 2 popular television series ended. I was a neither a fan or regular watcher of either LOST (ABC) or 24 (FOX). Millions of people are. I was told, however, that the series' finales both offered up a decent dose of sermon illustrations. Maybe that is true.

But it sort of brings up a larger question. Do I need to see everything to be truly culturally attuned? I don't think so.

The drawback, of course, is being accused of not liking something, taking offense, and reacting when you have not seen it. This, unfortunately, is rampant in Christian circles. What I am trying to say, is that you run the risk of operating solely on the principle of "someone told me to be offended, so I am". But then again, you also run the risk of praising something you have no clue about (as in Mark Twain's definition of a classic).

What about you? were you a fan of either of these shows? If so, how did/does it affect your preaching? Do you feel the need to check out every reference you preach on or criticize?

Movie Review- Iron Man 2

So, I finally saw this film. I say it that way because I had been wanting to see it since it was released a few weeks ago. Before I begin the actual review, I should state two important things:

1. I love superheroes, and the movies made about them.
2. I don't read comic books. I used tot read and collect them. And of the ones I did read, Iron Man was NOT one of them. It wasn't from a lack of interest. I just discovered I was reading too many titles that could not be supported by the budget of an unemployed teenager.

Now, onto my analysis.

Iron Man 2 is exactly what you want in a sequel: familiar characters and stars, enough of a recap of the original work, a sort-of picking up where the story left off, and it should not be as good as the original. The Godfather, Part II is the only known exception to this last criteria.

The film carries on the story of titan of industry, wealthy playboy, and technological genius Tony Stark. Stark, in the Iron man armor, has brought about a type of world peace. This has not escaped the notice of the United States government, who wishes to acquire the technology and use it for themselves. Stark refuses to sell to them. Meanwhile, in Russia, a heavily-tattooed physicist is making plans to get revenge on Tony Stark for perceived injustices committed against his father by Tony Stark's father during the Cold War. He tries to accomplish this by constructing a a rip-off (based on original designs) of Iron Man's (and Tony Stark's) ARC reactor. He then constructs a sort of exoskeleton which brandishes electrically-charged whips in each hand.

The film is essentially, even if unintentionally (I suspect intentional, though) about contrasts. Let me provide a few examples. Malibu, where Tony Stark resides, is always sunny and has perfect weather. (I have never been there, but I am told this is pretty accurate.) Russia is depicted as being gray, always overcast, and almost always snowing. Further, the film contrasts the sleek, sparkling, and sexy Iron Man armor with the crude exoskeleton of Whiplash. Then we are faced with the contrast of motives. The film contrast the (supposedly) pure motives of Tony Stark/Iron Man with not only the motives of revenge displayed by Whiplash, but also the motive of the United States government (is it to wage war or preserve peace?).

GOSPEL HANDLES

There's a fascinating line by Whiplash in the film when he describes his motive for wanting revenge on Tony Stark. He says, "If you could make God bleed, people would cease to believe in him." What do we, as Christians (and pastors) do with that? After all, we believe that, on the cross, God DID bleed. How would you preach this?

Also, the story that unfolds in the film, is partially a Gospel handle itself. It starts with a "very good" design (the Iron Man armor) which is then co-opted by something/someone evil, made to create chaos and bring about death, and finally is redeemed. What other Gospel Handles did you see? I can think of at least two.

CLERGY HANDLES

There are no depictions of clergy in this film.

All in all, I found this movie to be solid for a sequel. There were some parts that dragged, but on the whole it was pretty good. The lulls are salvaged by good performances by Don Cheadle, Scarlett Johansson, and especially, Gwyneth Paltrow and Mickey Rourke. Also noteworthy was the brief part played by Garry Shandling.

Pastoral Aesthetic Quotes- 13

"The act of singing together is deeply and indelibly human. When we sing, words are given greater range and power than when we speak. Something is shared in singing that goes beyond the words alone. Among Christians, this something has taken shape over many centuries in a practice that expresses our deepest yearning and dearest joy: the practice of singing our lives."

--Don E. Saliers (in "Singing Our lives" in Practicing Our Faith: A Way of Life. p. 180)

Pastoral Aesthetic Quotes- 12

"You don't have to burn books to destroy a culture. Just get people to stop reading them."

--Ray Bradbury

Pastoral Aesthetic Quotes- 11

"Technology is a mode of revealing. Technology comes to presence where revealing and unconcealment take place, where aletheia, truth, happens."

--Martin Heidegger

Thoughts on Glee

I'm a regular watcher of FOX's hit show Glee. But, I came to it the hard way. Let me explain. My fiancee loves the show. We watch it regularly together. I don't enjoy the show as much as she does. I give it credit for being original. And I generally enjoy the music that's performed. Beyond that, I wouldn't exactly describe myself as a fan. And, I do see why the show is popular.

But, I've been doing some thinking on the issue. The show does imitate life pretty well. Let me discuss a few examples:

1. We all wish our lives had a great soundtrack. To many (if not most) of us, music is important. Certain songs seem to really capture how we feel at certain times or about certain issues. It is not hard to imagine these songs playing, or like in the case of Glee to break out into actually singing these songs as we go through our lives.

2. People constantly lie to each other. This is reflected well in the show, as are modern attitudes about lying. Think about it! We go through life demanding honesty from various persons and entities, ranging from our spouses and partners to politicians and government to corporations. But we encounter and participate in so much lying every day, our hypocrisy is quickly exposed. Additionally, we live in a culture where lying is considered to be natural, but also a display of good manners. The characters are constantly lying to each other. Art imitating life indeed.

3. We all deal with Sue Sylvester... The character of coach Sue Sylvester is interesting, if not entirely original. Fellow English major may rake me over the coals for this comparison, but I've been fighting this battle since college. Sue Sylvester reminds me of Don John in Shakespeare's play Much Ado About Nothing. Both characters are bitter, scheming, and mean for no apparent reason. I have yet to figure out why she hates the glee club so much and constantly plots their destruction. But, daily we encounter this person at school, at work, even at church. They are mean for no reason, and on the surface at least, have absolutely no reason to act in such a way.

4....but outward appearances aren't everything. Despite her own narcissism and her seemingly unending rage at a extremely talented and unrealistic high school choir, there are other facets to Sue. She has a soft spot in her heart for the mentally challenged. She has a sister with Down's syndrome whom she sees regularly, as well as a cheerleader on the squad in the same condition. She is capable of love and care, even if no one else sees it.

There are other issues to be explored. These are just some thoughts and reactions to the show I wanted to explore.

Where does this fit into ministry? First, pastors, if the show is as popular as it's reported to be, there's a good chance that our parishioners are watching. It's good to be at least a little familiar. I also think that, like me, even if you don't end up liking the show, there's at least something in there to which you can relate. Even on the most basic level, you can always glean a fresh sermon illustration from it.

What about you? Are you a regular watcher of Glee? Are you a fan? What other issues can be explored that I overlooked?

Pastoral Aesthetic Quotes- 10

"What is good Christian music? It is the combination of words that are biblically sound and music that is appropriate to the words and to their intended purpose. In authentically Christian songs the words and musical score work together to accomplish the one purpose God has for His church on earth: bringing glory to himself. If the music does not glorify God, it is not good church music."

--Robert C. Anderson (in The Effective Pastor, p.327)

Movie Review- Date Night

I saw this film a few weeks ago, but am just now getting around to posting the review. I aplogize for the delay.

This is a fun movie. I don't normally go to or even really like romantic comedies. But this one focuses more on the comedy than the romance. That said, it's still a good time. Here again, we are presented with a film that, on the surface, does not contain much theological content, but from which Gospel handles can be extracted or imported.

The film tells the story of Phil & Claire Foster, a typical suburban couple, who have fallen into a routine, or a rut. They decide to break out of their routine, and have their weekly date night in New York City. They attempt to get a table at a new, trendy restaurant, but find they cannot get a table. So, they decide to pose as another couple and take the reservation for the no-shows. A case of mistaken identity occurs, and rouble (plus hilarity) ensues.

As I said above, this is not much theological fodder. But, that doesn't mean there are no lessons to be gleaned. The first, and most obvious, is the necessity of a "date night" or it's equivalent. This is especially important in ministry. The temptation is very great to fall into a marital "routine" in the name of "doing ministry" or arguing that this is the way it has to be. True, the average date night will not have the hilarity depicted in the film, but doing something special on a regular (if weekly is impossible). And "something special" does not necessarily mean an expensive, trendy restaurant. It can mean just getting out of the house for a couple hours.

GOSPEL HANDLES

The Fosters constantly seek refuge and help from a former client of Claire's. He provides them with help. Similarly, we can go to our Heavenly Father for shelter and help. He will give aid no matter how annoying we might be.

CLERGY HANDLES

There are no depictions of clergy in the film.

Above, I discussed the need for ministry couples to have a "date night" of their own. This film would be a quality addition to that.

Pastoral Aesthetic Quotes- 9

"Some books are to be tasted, others to be swallowed, and some few to be chewed and digested."

--Francis Bacon

Pastoral Aesthetic Quotes- 8

"Remember that many a devotional service, special-day program, Sunday or Weekday lesson, or for that matter Women's Club program has been redeemed from mediocrity through the intelligent use of great pictures, great stories, great poetry, and great music artistically interpreted."

--Cynthia Pearl Maus (in The Old Testament and the Fine Arts)

Movie Review- Crazy Heart

In another context, I might have enjoyed this film more than I did. Here's what I mean: I watched this film with really high hopes. All the reviews I heard, both from professional critics and laypersons alike, was that this film, as well as the performance by Jeff Bridges, was this year's The Wrestler. Had I not just recently see that film, I probably would have liked it better than I did, as I stated above. This is not to say the film was terrible, because it was actually quite good. It just wasn't what I needed or wanted at the time.

The film tells the story of Bad Blake (Bridges), a country music singer who has (to put it mildly) seen better days. He is just about broke and has taken to playing in bowling alleys and taverns. At an appearance in Santa Fe, NM he encounters a journalist, named Jean Craddock. They begin a romantic relationship. Without giving away too much of the plot, suffice it to say that things are wonderful for a while, then they go seriously awry.

The performance of Jeff Bridges is very good; enough to earn him an Academy Award. Outside of that, I was underwhelmed by the film. But, it was interesting to see Colin Farrell play a country music singer. I saw few, if any comparisons to The Wrestler, outside of a story about a man trying to come to grips with something.

All is not lost, however. I really enjoyed the soundtrack. It reminded just how much I love traditional country music. And I was impressed that the actors (Bridges and Farrell) did their own singing. The results are incredible. Not surprisingly the song "The Weary Kind" won an Academy Award as well.

GOSPEL HANDLES

This is a classic redemption story. One of the key moments in the film is when Bad loses his girlfriend's son in a shopping center. This essentially ends their relationship. Following the breakup and the ensuing heartache, he vows to (and does) become sober. This is a great example of repentance: not merely apologizing for a misdeed, but actually (literally) going the other way.

Further, the film highlights one more critical distinction. Or better, it offers a clarification: the nature of forgiveness. The secular world has, at times, a warped sense of Christian forgiveness. This film illustrates this quite well in a scene at the end. Bad have given up drinking and even changed his name from Bad, reverting back to his given name (Otis). He grants an interview to Jean, only to discover that she is engaged. The two are friendly, and seem genuinely happy to see each other. This is the clarification. Forgiveness does not mean there are no consequences, only that the offense (sin) is blotted out.

CLERGY HANDLES

There are no depictions of clergy in this film.

This film is worth seeing. However, I would wait until the DVD release. This film is appropriate for film discussion groups and sermon illustrations. Be advised that the profanity in the film will be off-putting to some church goers. Caution is advised when using video clips, but that's the standing rule for all illustrations using film.

Pastoral Aesthetic Quotes- 7

"If I am a romantic my parents bear no responsibility for it. Tennyson, indeed, my father liked, but it was the Tennyson of In Memoriam and Locksley Hall. I never heard from him of the Lotus Eaters or the Morte d'Arthur. My mother, I have been told, cared for no poetry at all."

--C.S. Lewis
(in "Surprised by Joy")

Book Review- Art and the Bible

I recently read Francis Schaeffer's collection of essays "Art and the Bible". (Do two essays constitute a "collection"?) If I'm being totally honest, and I am, I must confess to not having read much Schaeffer. I know he has a great many fans in Christendom, but I am not familiar enough with his work (yet) to be counted as one of them. Having established this, let me say that I enjoyed this little volume.

As I stated above, there are two essays in the book. The first essay is the one titled "Art and the Bible". In this section Schaeffer disputes the belief that art has no place in the life of the Christian. Rather, he argues, that art should be in the life of the follower of Jesus. In fact, the Scriptures are replete with examples of not only God-pleasing art, by art mandates by God himself simply for beauty. Examples that Schaeffer uses to support this thesis are the tabernacle and the Temple descriptions and directives found in the Old Testament.

Quite helpful in the section is his discussion of "graven images"; those things which are expressly forbidden by God in the 10 Commandments (depending on which numbering system you employ). This particular commandment, Schaeffer notes, is the first one to which those who argue against art in the life of believers point in support of their position. Schaeffer argues, convincingly I think, that God does not specify "Thou shalt not make representational art". Rather, the prohibition is on worshipping the art that is made.

The second essay, "Some perspectives on Art" is helpful as well. Here Schaeffer lays out what constitutes art, good art, and Christian art. To be sure this is not a detailed excursus on art theory. But, it does provide some introductory material for those looking to see how the arts can fit into their Christian faith and life. Further, it helps in clarifying the distinction between Christian art and "religious art". In other words, Schaeffer argues, again, convincingly I think, that a work of art may be considered Christian, even if it does not deal with or depict Jesus or any other traditional Christian icon. Schaeffer argues, that it is not so much content which makes a work or art Christian, but rather the worldview of the artist.

Schaeffer cautions against trying to determine an artist's worldview, or at least the totality of it in one painting. This, he says, is futile. He places the work of art in the context of the artist's entire body of work.

I would recommend this book for anyone who is looking to explore all dimensions of their walk with Christ. By this, I mean, art and aesthetics are often judged in Christian circles by their content and/or message and then deemed "bad" or "good", which are often synonyms for "appropriate" and "inappropriate". Both sets of terms have their place, but the distinction should be made.

There are any number of art theory and textbooks on aesthetics which expand on the principles Schaeffer puts forth in his essays.But, this read, as I said, is good for beginners and explorers.

One minor flaw in this book is that Schaeffer omits any discussion of film as an art form. This is easily remedied by applying his principles to film study and viewing.

Review- "American VI: Ain't No Grave" by Johnny Cash

So, I was pleasantly surprised to find the sixth and (I'm told) final album in the American recordings series by Johnny Cash available for purchase. Like my friend Nik, everything I had heard and read said the album was dropping on Friday (2-26-10). He suggested that maybe someone broke the street date, and as we all know, when one does it, everybody does it. Regardless, I purchased it on the spot, then gave it a listen on my way home.

In the interest of fairness, let me make one thing clear. As my regular readers know, I am the first to admit my biases. And this post is no exception. I am big fan of Johnny cash. I was a fan since my days of first getting into country music in high school. Despite that being the era when the American Recordings were first released, I did not come across them until a few years later.

That said, I had sky-high expectations for this release. And really, how could I not? When you are a fan, especially of a legend like Johnny Cash and the American Recordings, you pretty much demand and expect excellence. The drawback, of course, is that with such lofty expectations, you can really set yourself up for colossal letdown.

The previous sentence probably gives you an idea where this is going. And, you would be right. I don't if this is the case, but this is my impression. The album sounds like they had some tracks leftover from the American V sessions and decided not to let them go to waste. rather than put out a boxed set with these tracks included, they whittled down what they had into a new album. Again, I don't know if that was the intent. But that's what it sounds like to me.

Taken individually, each track is great. Taken together, the whole album just seems forced, superfluous, and unnecessary. I CANNOT believe I just used those words to describe a Johnny Cash album. But, that's my impression. And, that's not to take away anything from Johnny himself, or his musical legacy.

Three of the first four tracks are really the strength of the album. The first one, the title track, spotlights a dying Christian's certain belief in the Resurrection of the dead ( great illustration for a sermon on those texts which mention it or the Third Article of the Creed). The second, a cover of Sheryl Crow's "Redemption Day", is a masterwork. It has the same effect as his cover of Trent Reznor's "Hurt". Though not as epic as "Hurt", this one has the feeling that he means it. By that,I mean, comparing the Crow version with this version would produce two entirely different impressions and interpretations, based on both the age and belief system of the two artists. The fourth track, titled 1 Corinthians 15:55, reiterates Cash's belief in where he will go after his biological death. Beyond these tracks, the rest of the album just feels thrown together. Or, as much as an album of great individual tracks can feel that way.

I am curious as to why the tracks were picked. The album ends with Cash's cover of "Aloha Oe". Trust me, you'll recognize it when you hear it.

In all honesty, I wish that those responsible for producing this album had done this instead: Take tracks 7 and 8 off of American 5, and replaced them with tracks 1,2, and 4 from this one. That would have been pretty much the perfect Johnny Cash album. But I don't make those decisions.

Pastors, you can feel comfortable recommending this album to your congregations, adding certain tracks to your library, and even preaching from those tracks.

Pastoral Aesthetic Quotes- 6

"Ideas are the greatest resource a successful person could ever have. And when you surround yourself with creative people, you're never at a loss for inspiring ideas."

--John C. Maxwell (in "Mentoring 101")

Pastoral Aesthetic Quotes- 5

"Not since John the Baptist has there been a voice like that crying in the wilderness. The most male voice in Christendom. Every man knows he is a sissy compared to Johnny Cash."

--Bono
(liner notes: "The Essential Johnny Cash")

Pastoral Aesthetic Quotes- 4

"There can be no music without ideology."

--Dmitri Shostakovich

Pastoral Aesthetic Quotes- 3

"There can be no question. God is interested in beauty. God made people to be beautiful. And beauty has a place in the worship of God."

--Francis Schaeffer (in "Art and the Bible)

Pastoral Aesthetic Quotes- 2

"When we find ourselves perplexed by a scene in a movie or the lyrics of a song, we say to our friends, 'What do you make of that?' We aren't usually our friends to write a new scene or sing new lyrics- we aren't asking for more creation. We mean, what sense do you make of it? We are asking for interpretation."

--Andy Crouch (in "Culture Making" p.24)

Movie Review- Valentine's Day

Let me get my bias right out on the table. I am not really a fan of the so-called "romantic comedy". Actually, if I'm being totally honest, it's probably me least favorite drama. Nevertheless, as a service to you, my partners in ministry, I will review the film for you.

The film tells several stories at once. Essentially, each person in the story is trying to celebrate the perfect valentine's day. No one actually says this phrase, but you can tell it's on the characters' minds. You pretty much don't need to know much more than that.

Theological discussions can take place as a result of this film. However, as you might expect, much of it deals with Sixth Commandment and sexuality issues. Sex outside the boundaries of marriage abounds in this film, both as premarital and extramarital. But, we have to remember, Hollywood is not in the business of teaching Christian values or propagating a Biblical worldview. That said, I believe this is a pretty accurate reflection of our present culture.

Another discussion which may stem this film is the topic of "purpose". In this context, as in many romantic comedies, "purpose" is equivalent to "meant to be", at least relationally speaking. In any such discussion, the distinction among purpose, vocation and choosing a mate should be made clear.

One final point should be obvious, though I will state it. This film could serve as a springboard to the story of the actual St. Valentine.

GOSPEL HANDLES

Naturally, any film called "Valentine's Day" traffics in "love". Many different kinds of love exist, and they are reflections of God's love for us. There is a line spoken by one of the characters that actually is a pretty good Gospel handle. he says something to the effect of love means loving the other person entirely, not the just parts you like. What a good description of how God, who hates sin, showed us His love by sending Jesus. He redeemed us, even though we did not deserve it, or do anything to make God "like us".

CLERGY HANDLES

Some nuns are depicted. In one scene they hold a baby for a busy and slightly disorganized mother. Outside of that, they don't do anything particularly nun-like.

if you like romantic comedies, there is a good chance you will enjoy this film. I however, prefer other genres.

Pastoral Aesthetic Quotes- 1

"Except for theology, there is no art that can be placed in comparison with music." --Martin Luther

New Feature- Quotes

In an effort to post more regularly on this site, as well as to keep it from being simply a site for reviewing books and (mostly) films, I have decided to post quotes regarding spirituality and culture/the arts. They can and will come from a variety of sources, both ancient and modern. Feel free to comment on them. By the way, it should be noted that these, like most quotes are random and probably out of context. If you can add a bit of context, feel free to comment on that as well. Enjoy!

Movie Review- Sherlock Holmes

This film is a reinterpretation of the beloved literary characters, Sherlock Holmes, and his assistant Dr. Watson. The film itself is more packed with explosions and action than wits and logic. The film is entertaining, and does provide some interesting theological grist.

Much of the theological material deals with secret societies, and the "dark arts". Clearly, we are dealing with Second Commandment issues (or third, depending on your numbering system). This provides many opportunities for discussion, though showing the film (either clips or in its entirety) is probably better left to adult Bible study, or at least teens. It turns out that the "dark arts" in the film are the results of technology than actual Satanic influence, but the point that it is dangerous and nothing for believers to be fooling around with.

It can be argued that Holmes using his genius in the service of catching criminals is a good example of using your gifts from God in helpful ways or on vocation. This latter point is stretch.

The fact that the main villain finally gets his comeuppance is really more of a law handle.

GOSPEL HANDLES

The Gospel is pretty obscure. One possible handle, albeit a weak one, is the the practitioner of the "dark arts" are exposed as frauds. The Gospel handle, here is Satan and his minions , though dangerous, have no real power. The power is not in human reason and logic, but in Christ alone. As I said, this is a weak handle.

CLERGY HANDLES

There is one very brief image of a priest. He is seen at the execution of the villain.

This is an entertaining film , if nothing else. The theological material is unconventional, but interesting.

Movie Review- The Blind Side

Here we encounter a film where Christians are portrayed in a positive light. This film tells the story of Michael Oher, a guy with a horrendous childhood. He bounces around life with pretty much no direction, until he's offered a chance at success via a private school education with athletic potential. He's "de facto" adopted by a wealthy white family who takes him in, essentially out of Christian charity and the goodness of their hearts. He flowers under their generosity. Then they legally adopt him. He develops his athletic prowess, goes to college and is drafted by the Baltimore Ravens. This is all based on a true story.

There would be no problem showing this film in your church, to either a youth group or a larger audience. The demonstration of Christian charity preaches very well. Another point of discussion is when the football coach (out of selfish motivation) questions what it means to be a Christian. he does this toward the beginning when he lobbies to have Michael admitted to the school.

GOSPEL HANDLES

The biggest Gospel handle is the theme of adoption. Michael is adopted by the family. What better way to illustrate Scripture's point of our adoption through Christ? Further, when Michael first starts to live with the family, he is taken in, fed, clothed, sheltered, etc. This provides a fantastic illustration of Christ's words in Matthew's Gospel about welcoming the stranger.

CLERGY HANDLES

There are no depictions of clergy in this film.

I recommend this film for any pastor's film library. He or she may she it with confidence. What?! You don't have a pastor's DVD library?

Movie Review- Alvin & The Chipmunks: The Squeakuel

Here again, we are presented with a film that, at first glance, does not provide much opportunity for theological discussion. However, if we are willing to look a little deeper, we soon discover that there is, maybe, more than meets the eye. I'm not saying it's all that deep, but let's see what we can mine form the film.

This movie is cute and fun. It's a great kids movie. And sometimes, that's all a film needs to be. This film explores issues such as friendship, family, peer pressure, celebrity as well as others. Any or all of these issues can be or are important to kids.

GOSPEL HANDLES

The biggest of a gospel handle in here are acceptance after turning away (parallels with Luke 15). Other images of rescue are in the film.

CLERGY HANDLES

There are no depictions of clergy in this film.